Skip to main content

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience and security.

Direct Debit vs. Travel Ledger: Why It’s Time for the Industry to Modernise B2B Payments

All news

London, November 25, 2024 – Recent headlines in TTG UK have highlighted the risks of traditional payment schemes like Direct Debit. One such incident involved a travel agency facing severe financial disruption when an airline’s billing error led to BSP withdrawing a much larger amount than expected. This error left the agency unable to operate normally for 10 days, causing significant strain on cash flow until the funds were finally returned. This situation underscores the limitations of Direct Debit in B2B payments—limitations that many in the travel industry have experienced. While suppliers may see Direct Debit as a way to reduce risk, in reality, it often creates inefficiencies and unnecessary complexity. Travel Ledger offers a modern alternative, designed to provide transparency, efficiency, and fairness to both buyers and suppliers.

Direct Debit: Convenience or Complexity?

Direct Debit allows suppliers to collect funds directly from buyers’ accounts, offering convenience for suppliers. However, as a payment system originally designed for consumer transactions, it falls short when applied to high-value, complex B2B interactions.

Pros of Direct Debit

1. Supplier Automation: Suppliers can automate the collection process, including allocating funds to bookings, which reduces administrative overhead.

2. Widely Used: Direct Debit is an established and accepted payment method across various industries.

Cons of Direct Debit

1. Limited Buyer Benefits: Buyers still face manual reconciliation processes, with statements often provided in inconsistent formats, making automation on the buyer’s side nearly impossible.

2. Error Risks: Billing mistakes or incorrect charges disrupt cash flow and force buyers to reclaim funds, creating inefficiencies for both parties.

3. Inefficient Dispute Resolution: Discrepancies are usually handled via emails, file attachments, or spreadsheets. These manual processes require updates and leave no centralised record of resolutions.

4. Exposure to Funds Recall (UK-Specific): Under the Direct Debit Guarantee, buyers in the UK can request their bank to recall funds, even after the money has been transferred to suppliers. While this protects buyers, it exposes suppliers to significant financial risk, unlike EU/SEPA rules, which exclude B2B transactions from such guarantees.

5. of Risk Reduction: Suppliers often favour Direct Debit for the perceived control over payments. However, this control is undermined when buyers lack sufficient funds, causing Direct Debit requests to fail, or when buyers use dedicated accounts to limit their exposure to errors or arbitrary charges.

6. Slow Settlement Speeds: Under SEPA, funds clear in two days; in the UK, it takes three. Even after initial clearance, payments may fail due to insufficient buyer funds, as Direct Debit is not a real-time system that validates balances before processing.

7. High Overhead Costs: Suppliers must manage banking charges and Direct Debit mandates for each buyer, which need regular updates and re-signing if buyers change bank accounts. For suppliers who are also buyers, the closed-loop nature of Direct Debit means it cannot offer standardisation across supply chains, adding complexity and inefficiency.

Travel Ledger: A Modern, Balanced Solution

Travel Ledger reimagines B2B payments with a system designed to protect both buyers and suppliers while maintaining efficiency and trust.

Pros of Travel Ledger

1. Review Window for Buyers: Buyers can accept, amend, or reject transactions before payments are processed. This ensures accuracy and addresses discrepancies upfront.

2. Automation for Both Parties:
- Unlike Direct Debit, Travel Ledger uses a standardised format for all transactions across participants, enabling both buyers and suppliers to automate reconciliation processes and reduce manual interventions.
- Discrepancies and queries are logged directly within the platform, providing a shared, permanent record in the "shared Ledger."

3. Improved Dispute Management: Travel Ledger eliminates email back-and-forth, offering a centralised tool for query resolution. This reduces errors, saves time, and streamlines communication.

4. Error Prevention: By allowing a review before transactions are finalised, Travel Ledger ensures mistakes are caught before payments occur, safeguarding cash flow and buyer-supplier relationships.

5. Balanced Power Dynamics: Buyers gain greater control without undermining trust, while suppliers can monitor behaviour and ensure payment integrity.

6. No Exposure to Funds Recall: Travel Ledger eliminates the risk of funds recall, offering suppliers a secure alternative while maintaining fairness for buyers.

7. Real-Time Settlement:
- Payments are processed instantly, with funds clearing in the supplier’s account in real time. This ensures immediate reconciliation and removes the risk of recall.
- This speed and certainty allow for true accounts receivable/accounts payable (AR/AP) automation, significantly improving operational efficiency for both buyers and suppliers.

8. Standardisation Across Roles and Partners: Travel Ledger enables companies that are both sellers and buyers to standardise their payment processes on a single platform. This ensures seamless reconciliation with all partners—upstream or downstream—and reduces overall complexity, offering a scalable solution for financial management.

Comparative Overview

Feature

Direct Debit

Travel Ledger

Control for Buyers

Minimal

High (Approve/Amend/Reject transactions)

Automation

Supplier-only

Both parties

Error Risk

High (Errors affect cash flow directly)

Low (Errors caught before processing)

Dispute Management

Manual emails, attachments

Centralised, permanent record in Ledger

Transparency

Limited

Full transaction tracking and queries

Reconciliation

Manual, inconsistent formats

Automated with standard formats

Funds Recall Exposure

High (UK-specific risk under DD Guarantee)

None

Settlement Speed

Slow (2-3 days, risk of failure after credit)

Instant and risk-free

Standardisation

Closed-loop for each DD scheme

Platform-wide across roles and partners

Overhead Costs

Medium (Mandates, updates, bank charges)

Minimal

Conclusion

Direct Debit, while effective for consumer transactions, is increasingly unsuitable for the complexities of modern B2B payments. Its slow settlement times, exposure to funds recall, high overhead costs, and lack of standardisation make it less effective for today’s travel industry. Travel Ledger, on the other hand, provides a secure, efficient, and scalable platform tailored to the industry’s needs. By empowering both buyers and suppliers with real-time payments, automation, and transparency, Travel Ledger reduces administrative burdens and truly mitigates risk.

Isn’t it time to leave outdated systems behind and embrace a payment solution that works for everyone?

For more information about this article, please contact:
courtney.blyth@travelledger.org